Kids Near Airports Don't Read As Well -- Study
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Kids Near Airports Don't Read As Well -- Study

ITHACA, N.Y. -- April 30, 1997 -- Children in schools bombarded by frequent aircraft noise don't learn to read as well as children in quiet schools, Cornell University researchers have confirmed. And they have discovered one major reason: kids tune out speech in the racket.

"We've known for a long time that chronic noise is having a devastating effect on the academic
performance of children in noisy homes and schools," says Gary Evans, an international expert on
environmental stress, such as noise, crowding and air pollution. "This study shows that children
don't tune out sound per se, rather they have difficulty acquiring speech recognition skills."

Evans and his collaborator, Lorraine Maxwell, both environmental psychologists, are in the
Department of Design and Environmental Analysis in the College of Human Ecology at Cornell.

Evans and Maxwell compared children in a noisy school (in the flight path of a New York
international airport) with similar children in a quiet school. Unlike in other studies, both groups of
children were tested in quiet conditions. By doing so, the researchers showed that the link
between chronic noise and reading scores is the chronic noise exposure -- not noisy episodes
that might have occurred during the testing sessions.

Evans and Maxwell, whose study will be published in Environment and Behavior later this year,
compared a total of 116 first and second graders from two elementary schools. One school was
battered by peaks of up to 90 decibels of noise every 6.6 minutes by low-flying planes passing
overhead. The other school, closely matched for ethnicity and percentage of children receiving
subsidized school lunches and speaking English as a second language, was in the same urban
area but in a quiet neighborhood. Only children for whom English was their first language were
included in the study.

Each child was first given an auditory screening test. They were subsequently tested for abilities
to read, distinguish words with background noise, distinguish sounds with background noise and
distinguish word sounds (phonemes) under quiet conditions. The tests, with the exception of the
initial auditory test, were conducted by Elissa Tolle and Pegauy Santil, 1996 Cornell University
graduates in human ecology, who were both seniors at the time. When the data were analyzed, the
researchers controlled for mother's education.

"Interestingly, the findings were only significant for speech perception amidst noise, not sound perception" says Maxwell. "This implies that language acquisition is an underlying, intervening
mechanism that accounts for some of the noise-reading deficit link."

Evans and Maxwell also suspect that other factors may be at work in noisy schools and neighborhoods, such as teacher and parent irritability and their reluctance to talk as much, use as many complete sentences and read aloud as often as other teachers and parents.

Both researchers stress the need to reestablish an office of noise abatement within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; such an office was abolished during the Reagan administration. They point to other health concerns related to chronic noise, including hearing damage, chronic cardiovascular activation, elevated annoyance and irritation, motivation problems such as learned helplessness, and impaired cognitive development and reading achievement.

"These effects have all been well documented," says Evans. "Unfortunately, we're experiencing exponential increases in worldwide, ambient noise levels that are a byproduct of economic
development, particularly prevalent among economically underdeveloped countries."

The research was supported by the Cornell College of Human Ecology and the National Heart,
Lung and Blood Institute and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.


E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities